CRITERION 1 - CURRICULAR ASPECTS (100)
Key Indicator – 1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation (20)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
1.1.1 QlM | The Institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well – planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous internal Assessment. Write description in a maximum of 500 words | 20 | View |
Key Indicator – 1.2 Academic Flexibility (30)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
1.2.1 QnM | Number of Certificate/Value added courses offered and online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully completed during the last five years) 1.2.1.1: Number of Certificate/Value added courses offered and online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully completed during the last five years: _____ | 15 | View |
1.2.2 QnM | Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Value added courses and also completed online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. 1.2.2.1. Number of students enrolled in Certificate/ Value added courses and also completed online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. as against the total number of students during the last five years | 15 | View |
Key Indicator – 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (30)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
1.3.1 QlM | Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability in transacting the Curriculum Write description in a maximum of 500 words | 10 | View |
1.3.2 QnM | Percentage of students undertaking projects work / field work / internships (Data for the latest completed academic year)
1.3.2.1. Number of students undertaking Project work/ field work/ internships | 20 | View |
Key Indicator – 1.4 Feedback System (20)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
1.4.1 QnM | Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambience of the institution from various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on the feedback is made available on institutional website | 20 | View |
CRITERION 2 – Teaching, Learning and Evaluation (350)
Key Indicator – 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (40)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
2.1.1 QnM | Enrolment Percentage | 20 | View |
2.1.2 QnM | Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years (Exclusive of supernumerary seats) | 20 | View |
Key Indicator – 2.2 Student Teacher Ratio (40)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
2.2.1 QnM | Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | 40 | View |
Key Indicator – 2.3 Teaching – Learning Process (40)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
2.3.1 QlM | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process. Write description in a maximum of 500 words | 40 | View |
Key Indicator – 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (40)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
2.4.1 QnM | Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years 2.4.1.1 Number of Sanctioned post / required positions for teaching staff/ full time teachers year wise during last five years | 15 | View |
2.4.2 QnM | Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)
2.4.2.1 Number of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. year wise during the last five years | 25 | View |
Key Indicator -2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms (40)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
2.5.1 QlM | Mechanism of Internal / External assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time – bound and efficient. Write description in a maximum of 500 words | 40 | View |
Key Indicator – 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
2.6.1 QIM | Programme Outcomes(POs) and Course Outcomes(COs) for all programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and attainment of POs and COs are evaluated Write description in the maximum of 500 | 25 | View |
2.6.2 QlM | Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated. Explain with evidence in a maximum of 500 words | 20 | View |
2.6.3 QnM | Pass percentage of students during last five years.
2.6.3.1 Number of final year students who passed the university examination year wise during the last five years 2.6.3.2. Number of final year students who appeared for the university examination year wise during the last five years | 45 | View |
Key Indicator – 2.7 Student satisfaction survey(60)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
2.7.1 QnM | Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. | 60 | View |
CRITERION 3 - RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND EXTENSION (110)
Key Indicator – 3.1 Key Indicator 3.1- Resource Mobilization for Research (10)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
3.1.1 QnM | Grants received from Government and Non-governmental agencies for research projects/ endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | 10 | View |
Key Indicator – 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem (15)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
3.2.1 QlM | Institution has created an Ecosystem for Innovations and has initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge (patents filed, published, incubation center facilities in HEI to be considered) Write description in a maximum of 500 words | 10 | View |
3.2.2 QnM | Number of Workshops/Seminars/Conferences including on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Entrepreneurship conducted during the last five years | 5 | View |
Key Indicator – 3.3 Research Publication and Awards (25)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
3.3.1 QnM | Number of research papers published per teacher in the journals notified on UGC care list during the last five years. | 10 | View |
3.3.2 QnM | Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/ books published and papers published in national and International conference proceedings per teacher during the last five years | 15 | View |
Key Indicator – 3.4 Extension Activities (40)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
3.4.1 QlM | Extension Activities are carried out in the neighbourhood community, sensitizing students to social issues, for their holistic development, and impact thereof during the last five years. Write description in a maximum of 500 words | 15 | View |
3.4.2 QlM | Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government/ government recognized bodies Write description in a maximum of 500 words | 5 | View |
3.4.3 QnM | Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the Institution through NSS/NCC/ Red cross/ YRC etc, (including the programmes such as Swachh Bharat, AIDS awareness, Gender issues etc and/or those organized in collaboration with industry, community and NGOs) during the last five years. | 20 | View |
Key Indicator – 3.5 Collaboration (20)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
3.5.1 QnM | Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years | 20 | View |
CRITERION 4 - INFRASTRUCTURE AND LEARNING RESOURCES (100)
Key Indicator – 4.1 Physical Facilities (30)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
4.1.1 QlM | The Institution has adequate infrastructure and other facilities for a. teaching – learning, viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment etc b. ICT – enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS etc. Facilities for Cultural and sports activities, yoga centre, games (indoor and outdoor), Gymnasium, auditorium etc Describe the adequacy of facilities in maximum of 500 words. | 20 | View |
4.1.2 QnM | Percentage of expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation excluding salary during the last five years
4.1.2.1: Expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation, excluding salary year wise during last five years (INR in lakhs) | 10 | View |
Key Indicator – 4.2 Library as a learning Resources (20)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
4.2.1 QlM | Library is automated with digital facilities using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), adequate subscriptions to e-resources and journals are made. The library is optimally used by the faculty and students. Write description in a maximum of 500 words | 20 | View |
Key Indicator – 4.3 IT Infrastructure (30)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
4.3.1 QlM | Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection Describe IT facilities including Wi-Fi with date and nature of updation, available internet bandwidth within a maximum of 500 words | 20 | View |
4.3.2 QnM | Student – Computer Ratio ( Data for the latest completed academic year)
4.3.2.1 Number of Computers available for students usage during the latest completed academic year | 10 | View |
Key Indicator – 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (20)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
4.4.1 QnM | Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component, during the last five years
4.4.1.1 Expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component year wise during last five years (INR in lakhs) | 20 | View |
CRITERION 5 - STUDENT SUPPORT AND PROGRESSION (140)
Key Indicator – 5.1 Student Support (50)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
5.1.1 QnM | Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years.
5.1.1.1. Number of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, Government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years. | 20 | View |
5.1.2 QnM | Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organized for improving students’ capability 1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene) 4. ICT / Computing Skills | 10 | View |
5.1.3 QnM | Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years.
5.1.3.1 Number of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the institution year wise during last five years | 10 | View |
5.1.4 QnM | The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases 1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies 2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees | 10 | View |
Key Indicator – 5.2 Student Progression (35)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
5.2.1 QnM | Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years.
5.2.1.1 Number of outgoing students placed and / or progressed to higher education year wise during the last five years. 5.2.1.2. Number of outgoing students year wise during the last five years. | 25 | View |
5.2.2 QnM | Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years. (eg: IIT/JAM/NET/SLET/GATE/GMAT/GPAT/CLAT/CAT/GRE/TOEFL/ IELTS/Civil Services/State government examinations etc.) | 10 | View |
Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (45)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
5.3.1 QnM | Number of awards / medals for outstanding performance in sports / cultural actives at University / State / National / International level (award for a team event should be counted as one ) during the last five years. | 20 | View |
5.3.2 QnM | Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years. (organised by the institution/other institutions) | 25 | View |
Key Indicator – 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
5.4.1 QlM | There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and / or other support services | 10 | View |
CRITERION 6 - GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT (100)
Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (15)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
6.1.1 QlM | The governance and leadership is in accordance with vision and mission of the institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participation in the institutional governance | 15 | View |
Key Indicator – 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (12)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
6.2.1 QlM | The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, deployment of institutional Strategic/ perspective/development plan etc | 8 | View |
6.2.2 QnM | Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation 1. Administration 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examination | 4 | View |
Key Indicator – 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (33)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
6.3.1 QlM | The institution has effective welfare measures and Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff | 6 | View |
6.3.2 QnM | Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years.
6.3.2.1. Number of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies year wise during the last five years | 12 | View |
6.3.3 QnM | Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years.
6.3.3.1.Total number of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years. 6.3.3.2 Number of non-teaching staff year wise during the last five years | 15 | View |
Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (10)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
6.4.1 QlM | Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ nongovernment organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external) | q0 | View |
Key Indicator – 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
6.5.1 QlM | Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities | 15 | View |
6.5.2 QnM | Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analyzed and used for Improvements 2. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)/membership of international networks 3. Participation in NIRF 4. any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA,ISO Certification etc | 15 | View |
CRITERION 7 - INSTITUTIONAL VALUES AND BEST PRACTICES (100)
Key Indicator – 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
7.1.1 QlM | Institution has initiated the Gender Audit and measures for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years. Describe the gender equity & sensitization in curricular and co-curricular activities, facilities for women on campus etc., | 10 | View |
7.1.2 QnM | The Institution has facilities and initiatives for 1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures 2. Management of the various types of degradable and non degradable waste 3. Water Conservation 4. Green campus initiatives 5. Disabled – friendly, barrier free environment | 20 | View |
7.1.3 QnM | Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following 1. Green audit / Environment audit 2. Energy audit 3. Clean and green campus initiatives 4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion sustainability activities | 10 | View |
7.1.4 QlM | Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic diversity and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens. | 10 | View |
Key Indicator – 7.2 Best Practices (30)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
7.2.1 QlM | Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual | 30 | View |
Key Indicator – 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage | Link |
---|---|---|---|
7.3.1 QlM | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words | 20 | View |